<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battle of the sexes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joshreads.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joshreads.com/?p=938</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:16:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: M.C.C.</title>
		<link>http://joshreads.com/?p=938&#038;cpage=7#comment-172963</link>
		<dc:creator>M.C.C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshreads.com/?p=938#comment-172963</guid>
		<description># 281- My apologies for the double post, but I was looking at some of your posts and you do not have perfect grammar yourself (â€œi wasnâ€™t ableâ€ etc.)  How about looking at your own posts before (incorrectly) criticizing the grammar of others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 281- My apologies for the double post, but I was looking at some of your posts and you do not have perfect grammar yourself (â€œi wasnâ€™t ableâ€ etc.)  How about looking at your own posts before (incorrectly) criticizing the grammar of others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.C.C.</title>
		<link>http://joshreads.com/?p=938&#038;cpage=7#comment-172957</link>
		<dc:creator>M.C.C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshreads.com/?p=938#comment-172957</guid>
		<description>281- Yes, â€œtodayâ€™sâ€ is grammatically correct.  It is possessive.  The Far Side of today.  Nobody likes the grammar police, my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>281- Yes, â€œtodayâ€™sâ€ is grammatically correct.  It is possessive.  The Far Side of today.  Nobody likes the grammar police, my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King Folderol</title>
		<link>http://joshreads.com/?p=938&#038;cpage=7#comment-171888</link>
		<dc:creator>King Folderol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshreads.com/?p=938#comment-171888</guid>
		<description>GT - How can they tell the boys and the girls apart at Milford? It certainly can&#039;t be because of their faces. Do they have to use a marker on the back of their legs or something? I certainly can&#039;t tell.

SF - Slylock looks oddly depressed here, the jaunty look of confidence he typically sports absent from his countenance. Perhaps he realizes that this mystery is unsolveable, and that he will die locked in a boiler room with a mouse who is his best friend in the whole world. Man, that is depressing. It&#039;s depressing me, and I&#039;m not even a unloved fox solving pointless mysteries for a non-living.

BC - I expected a weird joke about the fallacy of evolution. Johnny Hart, you&#039;re breaking my worldview apart, dude.

FC - I see a long future ahead for Billy Keane of angry letters to the editor, a loveless marriage to a harpy of a wife, and days spent screaming at the tee-vee and the Readers Digest about some imagined transgression or another. Perhaps someday, when Bill Keane eventually kicks the bucket, lil&#039; Jeffy will treat us to this scenario. Until then, I guess, we must be satisfied with daring to dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GT &#8211; How can they tell the boys and the girls apart at Milford? It certainly can&#8217;t be because of their faces. Do they have to use a marker on the back of their legs or something? I certainly can&#8217;t tell.</p>
<p>SF &#8211; Slylock looks oddly depressed here, the jaunty look of confidence he typically sports absent from his countenance. Perhaps he realizes that this mystery is unsolveable, and that he will die locked in a boiler room with a mouse who is his best friend in the whole world. Man, that is depressing. It&#8217;s depressing me, and I&#8217;m not even a unloved fox solving pointless mysteries for a non-living.</p>
<p>BC &#8211; I expected a weird joke about the fallacy of evolution. Johnny Hart, you&#8217;re breaking my worldview apart, dude.</p>
<p>FC &#8211; I see a long future ahead for Billy Keane of angry letters to the editor, a loveless marriage to a harpy of a wife, and days spent screaming at the tee-vee and the Readers Digest about some imagined transgression or another. Perhaps someday, when Bill Keane eventually kicks the bucket, lil&#8217; Jeffy will treat us to this scenario. Until then, I guess, we must be satisfied with daring to dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://joshreads.com/?p=938&#038;cpage=7#comment-171385</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshreads.com/?p=938#comment-171385</guid>
		<description>Very interesting analysis though , Brendan...tha&#039;s a disturbing level of detail...is Bil Keane actually still drawing afew now and then still?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting analysis though , Brendan&#8230;tha&#8217;s a disturbing level of detail&#8230;is Bil Keane actually still drawing afew now and then still?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://joshreads.com/?p=938&#038;cpage=7#comment-171357</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshreads.com/?p=938#comment-171357</guid>
		<description>Hey Brendan (#311) -- I was actually talking about the character of Billy, all grown up, rather than the artist.  I assume that pretty much all the current FC&#039;s in the paper are Jeff jobs these days.

Josh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Brendan (#311) &#8212; I was actually talking about the character of Billy, all grown up, rather than the artist.  I assume that pretty much all the current FC&#8217;s in the paper are Jeff jobs these days.</p>
<p>Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
